Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Why Murdoch Can Afford to Leave Google for Bing

More Traffic Doesn't Mean More Money for Online Publishers

by Nat Ives
Published: November 23, 2009


NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- News Corp.'s talk about listing its sites exclusively on Microsoft's Bing sounds unpromising in several ways, but all of Rupert Murdoch's recent agitation and exploration are at least pushing one fact back to the fore: Web traffic only gets publishers so far in their quest for digital ad dollars. After a certain point, actually, traffic may not even matter.

Rupert Murdoch
AP
Rupert Murdoch
More traffic means more bragging rights and helps attract advertisers who need to reach a lot of people quickly, but each new increment of visitors is something less than a new gold mine. Most sites, for one thing, already have much more inventory than they can sell.

Would giving up some search traffic mean giving up a proportionate amount of ad revenue? "Right now it would not," said Jim Spanfeller, president-CEO of The Spanfeller Group and former president-CEO of Forbes.com. "Because no one's sold out."

"In this climate, most sites are probably sold out through maybe 40%," he added.

And ad networks typically deliver pennies for every thousand more visitors that publishers attract. "Most ad networks deliver between 16 cents and $1 for a thousand," Mr. Spanfeller said. "So even if you were taking that strategy and working with ad networks, the impact of what search was driving would be minimal."

What's more, not all traffic is equal. Readers who arrive via search are predominantly "one-and-done" visitors, not the people advertisers most want.

News Corp's. Wall Street Journal Online got 17.4% of its unique visitors in October through Google and less than 1% from Bing, according to Compete.com. But there's no way pulling out of Google would mean losing anything like 17.4% of its ad revenue.

"What's the point of having someone come [to us] occasionally who likes a headline they see in Google?" Mr. Murdoch asked in his recent Sky News interview. "Sure we go out and say 'We've got so many millions of visitors, you had better advertise' and so on. The fact is, there's not enough advertising in the world to go around to make all the websites profitable."

Friday, November 20, 2009

Can You Predict Successful Innovation? You Bet You Can

Hit New Products Aren't the Result of Just Luck or Creative Genius

by Phil Roos
Published: November 19, 2009


Popular opinion suggests that great innovation results from a mysterious combination of forces that make it appear to fall from the sky. Whether divine intervention, the harnessing of creative genius or luck, to many, innovation seems to surface at random moments and emerge from circumstances that cannot be reproduced or understood.

However, based on a 30-year analysis of 300 product categories covering 225 countries, it becomes clear this perception is false: Tomorrow's winning innovation can actually be predicted.

This is not to discount the importance of creative genius or occasional celestial help. But it is possible to determine what type of innovation will win in tomorrow's marketplace -- in essence, to see the future.

Great innovation builds on what comes before it and does not require people to make radical changes in beliefs or behavior. What often looks like breakthrough innovation is actually a small advance or twist on an established idea. That the change is evolutionary, however, doesn't keep its impact from being revolutionary.

Monitoring market evolution across the globe over time reveals patterns consistent across categories and markets.

Consumer needs evolve in predictable ways. There are waves of successful mass-market innovation that mirror a natural evolution in consumer needs.

Innovation cross-pollination
Innovation "news" that addresses those needs gets adopted in predictable ways. "News" in the form of new features/benefits first gets launched by smaller players. Competitors then add new twists, and eventually the category reaches a "tipping point" where an idea occurs with enough frequency for it to reach mass adoption. This diffusion of innovation cross-pollinates across categories and markets.

For example, Crest Whitestrips in many ways appeared to come out of the blue about 10 years ago. But an analysis of innovation patterns prior to its introduction suggests the occurrence of numerous previous products with similar approaches or delivery systems (for example, nicotine and estrogen patches, breath strips), all paving the way for Whitestrips' success. Whitestrips succeeded in the mass market by building on past news and combining it in an inventive way at the right time, addressing a natural evolution of oral-care needs.

In much the same way, Apple's iPod revolutionized the music industry in 2001, but its success was actually foreshadowed by portability, digitization and customization trends in everything from cameras to computers. Mobility of electronic devices was an innovation preceding the iPod, back to the original Sony Walkman. Thus the iPod emerged as a natural next step in the evolution of consumer multimedia needs.

The Whitestrips and iPod examples demonstrate the importance of hitting the market with the right news at the right time and in a way that addresses the natural evolution of consumers' needs. To do that successfully, it is critical to understand the four key drivers of winning innovation: business dynamics; consumer insights; creativity and design; and innovation patterns.

All are important, and a lot of good work is being done in the first three areas. But it is the fourth driver, understanding innovation patterns, that can help move the analysis from looking at the world today to projecting into the future. Deciphering existing and emerging patterns provides a view of what's going to happen tomorrow.

Understanding consumer needs
An important construct in understanding innovation patterns is a model of the evolution of consumer needs. Research indicates there are waves of successful mass-market innovation in various categories. The model can go back decades and looks at the early core motivators of the category (safety, well-being, gratification and convenience). Usually two or three category-specific motivators can be identified (things such as health, beauty and convenience). These are the primary reasons consumers come into a category in the first place.

Subsequent waves of innovation include products that deliver more advanced expressions of core motivators, the fusion of benefits and the appearance of secondary benefits. The model also plots where a category is in its evolution and shows it relative to other categories. This comparison pinpoints how a less-developed category may be influenced in the future by innovation "seeded" in more developed categories.

Based on this experience, it's easy to predict how and why consumer needs evolve. What is hard is to know what to do in response and when to do it.

This leads to a final and critical piece: identifying future innovation that will deliver against the evolving needs. To do that, all of the innovation "news" in a category can be mapped over time, much like a genealogical tree. Older or lower branches represent news that is already "mainstream" to consumers. Newer branches of the tree indicate emerging and future news, which can be identified well before it hits the mass market.

Moving beyond safe
By analyzing multiple trees across core and other categories from which innovation might be sourced, it's possible to predict what kind of innovation is likely to be adopted three to five years out. This work is a key step in helping find future white space and developing corresponding high-value strategic platforms.

It also takes a champion to put all these pieces into action, to really "see" and "be" the future of innovation within a category. The CMO plays a critical role in making sure his or her organization has the best seat at the innovation table by having the right people and the right approach in place. It takes leadership to move beyond "safe," close-in innovation and truly do the work required to be future-thinking. This is particularly challenging in an economy where each and every marketing dollar is being scrutinized. But this type of leadership is essential to position the organization and its brands squarely against the highest potential future opportunities, and to play and create in the white space that can deliver real growth.

Understanding innovation patterns is a key to defining future market opportunity and making innovation more predictable. But a little dose of creative genius is still needed to help bring identified opportunities to life, to actually create innovation that is the future of a category. A concerted creative and design effort based on evolving consumer needs and innovation-pattern learning can result in a much more future-focused, successful innovation effort.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Droga Takes a New Direction on Cleaners

Monday, November 9, 2009

New Verizon Christmas Commercial

In an effort to smash the IPhones smartphone hold on the cell phone market Verizon pushes the most popular complaint... AT&T's terrible service. Here comes the Droid. Will it gain popularity?

Here's a commercial from their $100 million spend starting on Monday.

Friday, November 6, 2009

Great Local Commercial

Evian Does it With This One.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

CEO Barry Diller Looks to Former NBC Exec to Ramp Up Branded Content

by Michael Learmonth
Published: November 04, 2009

NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- IAC is considering throwing CollegeHumor, in addition to cash, into Ben Silverman's nascent branded-entertainment company, Electus.



The final structure of the deal hasn't been fully hammered out, but executives with knowledge of the situation say CollegeHumor figures prominently into Mr. Silverman's plans, and could be reorganized into the new venture.

The deal would have Connected Ventures, parent of CollegeHumor and just-launched TV-production arm Notional, folded into Electus. Because both Electus and Connected Ventures are controlled by IAC chief Barry Diller, the shift wouldn't have too big an impact, but it would give Mr. Silverman an incentive to sell both TV and web concepts to networks and brands.


Related Stories
NBC's Ben Silverman Is Out After Two Years
Will Team With Online Giant IAC to Create Ad-Supported Programming Under Guise of 'Reveille Meets BBDO' "We are certainly going to be working with Ben, and we are focused on trying to blow up CollegeHumor," CollegeHumor President and co-founder Josh Abramson told Ad Age. "How that's going to pan out is still up in the air."

Electus is the newly chosen name for the venture headed by Mr. Silverman, the former NBC Entertainment chairman who left the fourth-place network earlier this fall. The idea is to create TV and web properties in conjunction with major marketers that want to be more deeply integrated into entertainment than with a typical 30-second spot.

Monetization
The talks are an indication that Mr. Diller is betting that Mr. Silverman's connections to marketers and his background in unscripted TV will have a positive affect on IAC's content efforts, which have yet to become a significant revenue generator for the company.



Virginia Sherwood
Ben Silverman Connected Ventures is at the core of those content efforts, but Mr. Diller is said to lack confidence that the group can effectively monetize the properties it creates. Last week, Mr. Diller said investment in original content would account for "less than 10%" of the $1.8 billion the company will have in cash over the next few years.

The newest executive at Electus, former YouTube head of content Jordan Hoffner, is certainly familiar with CollegeHumor's business; CollegeHumor runs a YouTube channel for its original programming, which has accumulated 16 million channel views.

An IAC spokesperson declined to comment on CollegeHumor's future relationship to Electus.

So far, CollegeHumor has had one show picked up by MTV, "The CollegeHumor Show," and another, "Pranked," created by CollegeHumor staff. Last summer, Mr. Diller spun off from CollegeHumor a TV-production arm called Notional, which is headed by CollegeHumor co-founder Ricky Van Veen. It, in turn, acquired production company City Lights and, along with it, "Chopped," a Food Network show about to start its third season.

IAC classifies Connected Ventures among its "emerging businesses," along with Tina Brown's Daily Beast and personal finance site FiLife.